I think that it is completely arrogant to assume that there
is no universal truth. I understand the concept of subjectivity. That everyone
can be living inside their own world while in this one. That to the delusional
man, the ball didn’t roll down the hill, it floated.
But, what goes beyond that?
Nietzsche says that, “There are many kinds of eyes. Even the
sphinx has eyes – and consequently there are many kinds of ‘truths,’ and
consequently there is no truth.”
But isn’t that vain? Arrogant to
assume that everything must have something by which to see a universal truth with.
Can this universal truth not just be?
Why does it have to make itself known and be degraded as something that has to
be experienced by (wo)man to be true
“...If seeing is believing, then believe that we have
lost our eyes.” - Manchester Orchestra, I Can Barely Breathe
People are calling it a universal truth, but limiting
it to earth. Ridiculous.
Bubble land, truth bubble,
whatever, I don’t care.
I believe that while alive, people can have something (a way
of living, an object, whatever) and live their life with the belief that it is
true. People can believe all they want;
it won’t make it true outside of their own minds.
“How do we know that’s true, how
do we know there’s an earth? How do we know we’re not in the
matrix? How do you
know?”
“It’s true that nothing’s true.” Okay, maybe
so. But only, to the person who thinks
he can see it.
Side Notes:
Today is the first
day that I didn’t say anything in the large circle. I feel disappointed. In
myself? Maybe. In the discussion? Maybe.
I am tired.
I believe I am tired.
All persons identical to Haley
Sorg(at the time this post was written) are persons who believe themselves to be tired.
Tell me how that is false.
No comments:
Post a Comment